Should education be free?

by Amrit Hallan on May 18, 2013

chomsky-quote

 

I came across this image on Facebook in which Noam Chomsky explains how the current, fee-based education system perpetuates a self-defeating consumerist society. He’s talking about the American system where students have to get in debt in order to get higher education. By the time they are out of college, they are in big debt and paying it off becomes an immediate priority. This doesn’t give them much space for independent thinking. They get sucked into the rat-race and then become a part of it.

A higher fee makes education mercenary, it turns it into a commodity, from a pursuit of enlightenment. But then resources need money. Educators and administrators need to be paid. Buildings, infrastructure and upkeep require money. From where does this money come? Mostly from students, and partially from donors, sponsors and government subsidies. What if students don’t have to pay anything?

There can be many outcomes. In India the amount of fee you pay depends on the type of higher education institution you are attending. Some often lament that most students don’t take education seriously because they have to pay pittance, and it might be true. How people claim, proudly, that they mostly bunked classes in college. Would they have bunked them had they been paying a hefty fee? I doubt that.

Does a higher fee instill as sense of seriousness both among the educators and the students? To a great extent it might be true.

So the problem is not with a higher fee or the debt students incur in the process. The problem is the approach we take towards education. It no longer remains an intellectual pursuit. Neither teachers nor students these days understand the true meaning of education. Instead of becoming a stairway to a particular career (there is nothing wrong in that inherently) education must become a stairway to enlightenment and a higher form of thinking. Since current education system completely focuses on the certificate that you eventually get, the important part gets lost, the learning part. What matters is the degree, not the education we have attained. What matters is the numbers and grades we have acquired, rather than the values we have developed.

The value-based education system will stand us in good stead in every field, whether it is science, humanities our technology. With a better frame of mind we are in a better condition to contribute, even if we have lots of debt to pay. The message from Chomsky comes out of his leftist leanings and not from a true desire to find a lasting solution. The lasting solution would be to make the education a state of being, rather than a certificate. Expensive or inexpensive education doesn’t really matter.

 

{ 0 comments }

The latest to join the bandwagon of “pardon Sanjay Dutt” is Mamta Bannerjee, the whimsical chief minister of West Bengal. Before her, almost entire Bollywood, the so-called “prominent” political leaders and even a mentally befuddled member of Judiciary have been advocating his pardon, and in fact the whole thing has become an obsession with the who-is-who of the country.

This has totally baffled the common citizens, especially, thanks to the Internet, those who have access to detailed information and not the expurgated form that appears in mainstream media. They know that even if Sanjay Dutt wasn’t a terrorist, he definitely hobnobbed with the top terrorists and underworld members of the subcontinent, and that too, knowingly.

Up till now my knowledge of what actually happened in 1993 and to what extent Sanjay Dutt was involved was quite limited. For instance I only knew of the purchase of a couple of guns. I had no idea that he had purchased multiple AK-56s, magazines as well as grenades. To make matters worse, these weapons were a part of the consignment that had been smuggled into the country from the neighboring Pakistan to cause large-scale destruction and disturbance in the country. Many may say that (as Diggy has insinuated that he was just a kid at that time) he had no knowledge of why the weapons had been smuggled into the country but one has to be a total buffoon in order to be ignorant of such a fact, especially during those days. Even secretly he never tried to inform the police that weapons were being imported and some terrorist activity was going on. His detractors also claim that he knew of the impending blasts. Doesn’t that make him an accomplice?

The law agencies at every stage have tried to mitigate his involvement. Bizarrely, he is only being punished under the arms act whereas many of his accomplices were booked under TADA. According to this old Tehelka article, Sanjay Dutt was in direct contact with Anees Ibrahim who is the brother of the notorious underworld don Dawood Ibrahim. This portion is quite revealing:

The crucial information that Sanjay had been calling Anees came from the filmstar himself. Says MN Singh, who headed the investigation, “He himself said that he had made the calls. This information came from him and only then did we get the supporting mtnl printouts.” The printouts showed that seven calls had been made to Anees’s number at White House in Dubai. The police also took a sworn affidavit from the Indian Embassy in Dubai saying that the Dubai number to which the calls were made by Sanjay was indeed that of Dawood’s brother. The police also procured the Dubai telephone directory which mentioned the same number against Anees’s name. Only a few of the over 150 accused in the serial blasts case had been in touch with either Dawood or Anees while the blasts conspiracy was being hatched. Sanjay was one of them. All these records were handed over to the CBI. However, when the time came to pin Sanjay down in court, the CBI chose to omit the record related to the telephone calls in its final submission against Sanjay before the TADA court. The prosecution’s submission, a copy of which is with Tehelka, reveals that the CBI has not brought the telephone conversation-related evidence on record. Sources in the CBI said that since the court had not accepted the telephone records as evidence against Sanjay, they decided to delete them from their written submission. Maneshinde also revealed that the calls “have not come on record”.

In what appears to be a dilution, the CBI also failed to press the charge of destruction of evidence against Sanjay in their written submission. Initially, when the Mumbai Police filed the chargesheet, a copy of which is with Tehelka, they had slapped Sanjay with that charge. Nullwala, who destroyed the weapons on Sanjay’s instruction, has been convicted under the Arms Act. Commenting on the disparity, he told Tehelka, “This will always happen… this is nothing new… See this thing… politicians… they do every possible thing… nothing happens to them… Why? It comes in the paper… it comes on the idiot box every single day… but what happens… it’s always people like us, we have to suffer… you know, we are the example for the world…”

According to this article the CBI totally muddled that case by failing to establish that the arms that reached Sanjay Dutt’s house were the same arms that had been smuggled into the country to cause widespread unrest and this is what totally mitigated his involvement.

According to another article in The Indian Express,

The masterminds of the 1993 bomb blasts in Bombay had a twin agenda. One was to attack the city through a series of explosions, and the other was to arm members of their community well enough to hold their own in communal clashes the blasts were expected to trigger.

For this, assault rifles, pistols and hand grenades were brought from Pakistan and several young men were also taken to Pakistan and given arms training, police officers linked to the investigation recalled after this week’s Supreme Court verdict in the 20-year-old case.

The arms landed at two places in Raigad district and one in Gujarat. The Gujarat consignment was hidden in the cavity of a vehicle and brought to Mumbai by road, driven by Abu Salem, who went on to become a prominent gangster.

Salem and his accomplices needed a quiet place to open the welded cavity and remove the arsenal. The office of Magnum Productions, owned by Hanif Kadawala and Sameer Hingora, on Linking Road in Bandra, was chosen. Dawood Ibrahim’s brother Anees called Hingora and Kadawala and told them to allow Salem to use their compound.

The partners, however, were involved in a dispute with their landlord and did not want to risk catching his attention and suggested using actor Sanjay Dutt’s house instead.

Dutt was contacted and he agreed. Hingora went with Salem after the latter feared he would not be allowed inside by the guards, and the vehicle was taken to Dutt’s garage.

“The Mumbai Police had provided some guards for Sunil and Sanjay Dutt in light of the 1992-93 riots, and the garage was in direct line of sight from where they were stationed. Dutt asked them to move over to another gate, after which the cavity in the vehicle was opened and the arsenal extracted,” said one officer.

Isn’t it strange that when dreaded terrorists were looking for a place to open the welded cavities of the van in which weapons had been concealed they decided to contact Sanjay Dutt, just like that? Actually, just like that. Would gangsters and terrorists randomly call someone, and that too the son of an influential politician, to help them retrieve weapons from a vehicle simply because they don’t have any other place? Even if he hadn’t kept the arms illegally with him, isn’t it quite extraordinary that the top terrorists of the subcontinent were so comfortable with him that they could trust him with such knowledge? Doesn’t this establish the fact that he already enjoyed close links with such elements to such an extent that they easily took him into confidence while carrying out such a serious operation?

Just illegal arms act? Error of judgment? Youthful indiscretion? Who are we kidding?

It was also brought to my notice that even in 2002 (and the recording was played on live TV) he was calling up gangsters to sort out another actor Govinda. And this was something that was caught. Who knows what all operations he has been running with his underworld contacts? Alarmingly, people support him across political and ideological lines despite his long-standing association with the underworld. The late Balasaheb Thakerey said about him, “All the boy needs is three tight slaps.”

This only means two things: these people are totally dumb or unconcerned about the safety of the country, or at one stage or another, they have benefited from this association of his.

 

 

{ 1 comment }

What makes Rafi, Lata, Kishore and many of their contemporaries timeless

March 23, 2013

I am an avid Hindi film music fan (I know, this sounds clichéd) although of late I wasn’t getting much time to listen to 100s of my favorite songs. While recovering from a severe bout of herpes (no, as many of you might think, it was not sexually transmitted) I got to spend lots of [...]

Read the full article →

Why were the Italian Marines forced to come back to India

March 22, 2013

Recently the Italians cocked a snook at the Indian government by refusing to send back the Italian Marines who are accused of murdering two Indian fishermen in the Indian Ocean. These Marines have already had a very easy go. First they were allowed to attend Christmas at their native Italian places, and then they were [...]

Read the full article →

Now that Afzal Guru and Ajmal Kasab are hanged, we should move on

February 10, 2013

At a personal level I’m against death sentence, but I would also like to mention that had the Indian government taken care of Maulana Masood Azhar on time the Kandahar plane hijacking wouldn’t have happened. The hangings of Afzal Guru and Ajmal Kasab, although nothing more than political posturing by the ruling UPA government (lead [...]

Read the full article →

Why the Congress believes more in doles and handouts

February 8, 2013

This afternoon my wife and I were having a discussion about the political and social state of affairs. It all started with how most of the DDA flats have been constructed paying scant regard to sunlight and flow of wind. This brought us to the topic of how improving quality of life is of no [...]

Read the full article →

What’s wrong if someone says that most of the corrupt come from a particular class of people?

February 6, 2013

Yes, I am a bit slow on jumping on the bandwagon of the recent Ashish Nandy controversy. By any chance if you have no clue of what I’m referring to, in the recently held Jaipur Literary Festival, noted (and to some, notorious) sociologist known to be a major player in the Indian league of communal [...]

Read the full article →

Yes, there are Hindutvavadi trolls on the Internet and elsewhere, but

February 4, 2013

In the morning I was reading this blog post on Kafila in which the writer attempts to explain why he signed a petition against death penalty for Ajabmal Kasab, one of the main accused of the 26/11 Mumbai terror attack. He wrote the blog post in response to a recent list of signatories released by [...]

Read the full article →

Civilization and democracy cannot be selective

February 3, 2013

Last night suddenly there was a tweet from someone with the Twitter handle @NilimDutta (retweeted by @Vidyut) that the Dispur police had assaulted him and his family, and his ankles had been fractured. People quickly started retweeting and forwarding his tweets to influential people like @BDUTT and @PritishNandy. Whoever was online at that time pitched [...]

Read the full article →

This problem is not just particular to Muslims

February 2, 2013

I was just reading a heart-felt piece in the Tehelka magazine, regarding how Muslims are made to feel like outsiders, and worse, like traitors, in their own country. She recounts two incidents: Once she was returning from Ghaziabad to Delhi with her mother, they choose to board in a private bus which was full of [...]

Read the full article →