The World Cup? Yawn.

by Amrit on 18th June 2006

Today’s column by M.J. Akbar in The Asian Age echoed the exact sentiments I’ve been experiencing ever since the brouhaha over the World Cup started in our country. Akbar says it was humiliating to see young men performing a “yagna” praying for the victory of the Brazilian team. I wouldn’t go as far as terming it “humiliating” as we can have a favorite team, but it sums up our collective attitude.

In India we have a saying that goes like this: Begani shaadi me Abdullah diwana which means that you don’t belong to the party but still you are there and desperately, pathetically, you are trying to be a part of it as if you are having a helluva time. We don’t have a team in the World Cup, but we have brawls guzzling big mugs of bear and beverages supporting teams from distant countries who couldn’t care less if we existed on the map of the world. You may call it my complex, but I find all this “football mania” weird, escapist, and living in denial.

But why not watch matches just for the spirit of the game, you may ask. After all don’t they exemplify the apogee of human striving without being destructive? Don’t the players etch the legends of their hard work on the firmament of world history? Don’t they invoke the ancient Olympian spirit and hoist it up in the stratosphere? Yes, they do. But is the sport just about playing football? Is it not about winning and losing? Entire nations fall into depths of gloom when their teams lose. Every goal opens the floodgates of heaven and hell depending on which side you are. Players are even killed when their mistakes cost their teams matches. National prides are built and crushed during matches. New gods are created and the old gods are relegated to their glorious pasts. I don’t dislike football for all this.

I just don’t like basking in others’ glory. I like basking in my own glory, and if I don’t have that glory, I strive to create it and then bask in that glory. I couldn’t care less if Brazil wins (with due respect to Brazilians) or loses, but if our team is not a part of the World Cup, then for me it is just a news that appears on the last three pages of my newspaper. Coming back to the newspaper, the columnist says that the population of Togo can be put in a small satellite town of Delhi and it still manages to get its team in the World Cup. “Isn’t it shameful?” the author asks. Of course it is. And it is because the same passion lacks when it comes to grooming our own football team. Why aren’t there “yagyas” for the resurrection of our teams? Why isn’t there similar “passion” when it comes to getting our own football players into the World Cup? Are we merely good at clapping and jubilating at other teams? If we love the game so much, why don’t independent individuals start funding a national team by contributing small amount of money and time? Where does our game spirit go then?

No, this is not a xenophobic post and I’m not saying we shouldn’t cheer for the other teams. Of course they represent the pinnacles of hard work, dedication and perseverance and they should be vehemently applauded for that. It’s a treat to watch strong and agile players showcasing their physical and temperamental robustness, but it stops at that for me. Unless my country’s team is out there playing with the other teams, I’d rather spend time watching some cheap Hindi or English flick on TV.

{ 9 comments }

ashish singh 18th June 2006 at 9:54 am

Ah! come off it, Amrit – why read the comments, why not watch the football. Do we need to back only our side. I am not getting into a discussion on the lack of sporting culture (barring cricket – which I don’t consider to be a sport anyways), but watch the football maan. Its beautiful. And usually it is not the high priced players in expensive teams. Watch Ghana – my money is on them to make it to the semifinal. Some people don’t have favourites, they just like the 24 passes that Argentina made.
Ignore Mr Akbar, he wasn’t that great a footballer anyways ;-)

zhivago 18th June 2006 at 7:03 pm

im betting on ecuador…but hey amrit, i thought u only care about ppl, why not care about all ppl…regardless of georgraphic boundries?

only ppl who could bring india to world cup are the punjabis…but too bad they are all on drugs, thanks to the rss!

Gehen Sie Ekuador!

Nanhey 19th June 2006 at 4:43 am

punjabis, drugs, and RSS??? i didn’t get the connection.

zhivago 19th June 2006 at 5:29 am

nanhey, dont have too much time…but try to study a bit of punjabi politics, RSS history in Punjab, education system in punjab, and economic growth in punjab.. compared to rest of the states on india…things will start to fall into place.. real quickly or go to http://www.panthic.org, its really good media, from a sikh perspective.

thanks

zhivago 20th June 2006 at 1:50 am

hey nanhey…im not sure if a comment was deleted, …yes, it was deleted :-) — By Amrit

zhivago 21st June 2006 at 7:38 pm

hey amrit…why? shes claims on her blog that you and her have an open relationships and you dont care about her one night stands…where is the freedom of expression on this blog man? i thought you guys were “forward” thinking…so why cant you handle a guy asking for a one night stand from your sister, espeically since i can pass for iranian, her preference.

Amrit 21st June 2006 at 10:20 pm

Hi Zhivago, I know what you’re saying, and I cannot dispute your logic, but since this is my blog, I can decide what appears here. If you want to leave comments for her, you can leave them at her blog :-) .

About forward thinking…I don’t think having one-night stands means you’re forward, it actually means you’re primitive. I think the phrase “forward thinking” is misinterpreted by most people and they really put me off. In reality, forward thinkers are progressive thinkers, and they mostly aspire for some greater good. People who believing in one-night stands are mostly selfish, cannot control their urges and basically have no respect for their bodies and for themselves. Call me atavistic, but I have no respect for such people. I understand if you don’t understand it.

zhivago 22nd June 2006 at 1:48 am

hey amrit! I DO understand it! and man do i agree with it! u see thats why i like you, believe it or not. on certain things you are too diplomatic and unrealistic and sort of selfish cuz your target seems to be the majority but anyway, even though im in the west, i believe this side of the globe has completely lost its grace, self-respect, virtue all in the name of modernity or “freedom” or even feminism. i believe women have been robbed, very cleverly because they dont even know they have.

i knew you were gonna tell me to leave that message on her blog, really i thought you would somewat be ok with it, and maybe also i wanted test the waters. but from your sisters point.. someone else asked your sister how she feels about her brother and his friends coming and reading such personal stuff, it must be hard for any brother…and she seems to reply as though you are perfectly ok with it. so i took the chance.

i just have never met any brother,even in the west, who will accept his sister wanting to have one night stands and then publishing such fantasies to the world.

anyway…i wasnt happy requesting such a thing from her especailly on your blog, but im glad i did. :)

storage stockport 2nd February 2010 at 12:54 am

How long do you spend a day coming up with stuff like this?

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: