<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Thorn Called Taslima Nasreen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.writingcave.com/a-thorn-called-taslima-nasreen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.writingcave.com/a-thorn-called-taslima-nasreen/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 06:17:49 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Amrit</title>
		<link>http://www.writingcave.com/a-thorn-called-taslima-nasreen/comment-page-1/#comment-42397</link>
		<dc:creator>Amrit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 21:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writingcave.com/a-thorn-called-taslima-nasreen/#comment-42397</guid>
		<description>Yes Mai, even I loath those Sardarji jokes because most of them are &quot;jabardasti ke jokes&quot; and the only, supposed, humor in them is that there is a Sardarji in the joke. I can very easily create a similar, even nastier joke (in fact many do exist) on Panditji or Gujjuji or Bihariji or Madrassi ji or whateverji.

It&#039;s bad that Amu has been censored in India. On the contrary Parzania, a film based on Gujarat riots, has won many accolades. I wish Amu could be uploaded to YouTube. I think Sikhs should purchase the copyright of the movie and then distribute it freely over the Internet if the Indian government doesn&#039;t lift the censorship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Mai, even I loath those Sardarji jokes because most of them are &#8220;jabardasti ke jokes&#8221; and the only, supposed, humor in them is that there is a Sardarji in the joke. I can very easily create a similar, even nastier joke (in fact many do exist) on Panditji or Gujjuji or Bihariji or Madrassi ji or whateverji.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s bad that Amu has been censored in India. On the contrary Parzania, a film based on Gujarat riots, has won many accolades. I wish Amu could be uploaded to YouTube. I think Sikhs should purchase the copyright of the movie and then distribute it freely over the Internet if the Indian government doesn&#8217;t lift the censorship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mai (Harinder Kaur)</title>
		<link>http://www.writingcave.com/a-thorn-called-taslima-nasreen/comment-page-1/#comment-42389</link>
		<dc:creator>Mai (Harinder Kaur)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 19:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writingcave.com/a-thorn-called-taslima-nasreen/#comment-42389</guid>
		<description>Suppression/repression/oppression by those in power is easier than teaching the people the responsible use of freedom.

I personally believe - although my libertarian stance on this often gets me into trouble - freedom of expression, short of violence - ought to be permitted.  I do not believe in government censorship whether in India or my home country of Canada.  Certainly in any country that calls itself a &#039;free democracy&#039; people should be able to express what&#039;s on their minds, even if it is offensive to some groups.  Before I&#039;m asked, yes, I do include speech and ideas that I deplore, whether the racism of the Ku Klux Klan and such groups in the States, the ramblings of Osama bin Laden (wherever he is) or those ridiculous Sardar jokes in India that so offend my own community.  They offend me as well.  But I would rather be offended and free than limit my expression or that of others.  I let others know, politely, I hope, when they offend me rather than run to the courts to shut them up.  If courtesy doesn&#039;t work, I can get loud and nasty, but by limiting their free speech, I must of necessity limit my own, as well, so I leave the government, which is, at best, corrupt, out of the picture.

I insist on being free to express my own controversial beliefs - I specifically speak here of Khalistan - so how could I possibly deny that same right to others?

As a kind of an aside, I am still seething over the Indian censorship of the movie &lt;i&gt;Amu&lt;/i&gt;.  What are they afraid of?  Don&#039;t they realise that such moves make India look like a guilty, cringing, cowardly criminal in the eyes of the rest of the world?  Are they really so frightened of a little bit of light being shed on a difficult topic?  I guess the answer is YES.  Ostrich government. *snickers*

In short, I think government trying to control the thoughts of their citizens through censorship is stupid, short-sighted and WRONG.

Thanks for letting me have my say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suppression/repression/oppression by those in power is easier than teaching the people the responsible use of freedom.</p>
<p>I personally believe &#8211; although my libertarian stance on this often gets me into trouble &#8211; freedom of expression, short of violence &#8211; ought to be permitted.  I do not believe in government censorship whether in India or my home country of Canada.  Certainly in any country that calls itself a &#8216;free democracy&#8217; people should be able to express what&#8217;s on their minds, even if it is offensive to some groups.  Before I&#8217;m asked, yes, I do include speech and ideas that I deplore, whether the racism of the Ku Klux Klan and such groups in the States, the ramblings of Osama bin Laden (wherever he is) or those ridiculous Sardar jokes in India that so offend my own community.  They offend me as well.  But I would rather be offended and free than limit my expression or that of others.  I let others know, politely, I hope, when they offend me rather than run to the courts to shut them up.  If courtesy doesn&#8217;t work, I can get loud and nasty, but by limiting their free speech, I must of necessity limit my own, as well, so I leave the government, which is, at best, corrupt, out of the picture.</p>
<p>I insist on being free to express my own controversial beliefs &#8211; I specifically speak here of Khalistan &#8211; so how could I possibly deny that same right to others?</p>
<p>As a kind of an aside, I am still seething over the Indian censorship of the movie <i>Amu</i>.  What are they afraid of?  Don&#8217;t they realise that such moves make India look like a guilty, cringing, cowardly criminal in the eyes of the rest of the world?  Are they really so frightened of a little bit of light being shed on a difficult topic?  I guess the answer is YES.  Ostrich government. *snickers*</p>
<p>In short, I think government trying to control the thoughts of their citizens through censorship is stupid, short-sighted and WRONG.</p>
<p>Thanks for letting me have my say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karan v/s Arundhati at Blogbharti</title>
		<link>http://www.writingcave.com/a-thorn-called-taslima-nasreen/comment-page-1/#comment-42373</link>
		<dc:creator>Karan v/s Arundhati at Blogbharti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 17:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writingcave.com/a-thorn-called-taslima-nasreen/#comment-42373</guid>
		<description>[...] Amrit reacts on Karan Thapar&#8217;s interview with author and activist, Arundhati Roy. It’s amazing to see the man giving silly arguments in defense of Buddhadeb for orchestrating the ouster of the Bangladeshi author Taslima Nasreen from Kolkata. How does he sustain his job? Karan’s point of view is that the poor chief minister had no choice left, that in order to prevent many people from losing their lives he had to send her away and withdraw the security given to her. Linked by BA. Join Blogbharti facebook group. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Amrit reacts on Karan Thapar&#8217;s interview with author and activist, Arundhati Roy. It’s amazing to see the man giving silly arguments in defense of Buddhadeb for orchestrating the ouster of the Bangladeshi author Taslima Nasreen from Kolkata. How does he sustain his job? Karan’s point of view is that the poor chief minister had no choice left, that in order to prevent many people from losing their lives he had to send her away and withdraw the security given to her. Linked by BA. Join Blogbharti facebook group. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Political News You Need to Know &#187; A Thorn Called Taslima Nasreen</title>
		<link>http://www.writingcave.com/a-thorn-called-taslima-nasreen/comment-page-1/#comment-42352</link>
		<dc:creator>The Political News You Need to Know &#187; A Thorn Called Taslima Nasreen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 13:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writingcave.com/a-thorn-called-taslima-nasreen/#comment-42352</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
